Forum:Overall/Overview section consistency

Hello. Just thought I'd post here to try and help clean up these sections slightly and make sure I understand from some more experienced editors that I'm approaching this properly. I'll just put it in numbered form for simplicity's sake.

1. These sections vary between being called "Overall" or "Overview". Which one is preferable to have as a heading on all wiki pages so that it's more uniform? The FE4 pages are somewhat split between these two as headings.

2. Wondering about honesty. Obviously, these sections are open to subjectivity, but when to call a spade a spade? Should all overview/overall sections attempt to highlight characters in a positive light and avoid outright calling them poor characters? Even if they're clearly the worst characters in the game or among the worst? For example, Tobin from Gaiden, Arden and Hannibal from Fire Emblem 4. Characters that are just clearly worse than everyone else. How honest to be in this regard? While it's technically possible to focus the hell out of these characters and make them as good as some of the better guys(like throwing a bunch of ability and +stat rings on Arden), on average they're just bad.

3. Just wondering about opinions on the ideal level of detail. I wrote an overall section that is fairly in depth on Naoise, but I'm unsure if it's too long. On the flipside, we have characters like the current Iuchar article which are 3 sentences long. Then there's a medium level which would be the current Quan article. What is best?