Talk:Kurthnaga

Regarding a Piece of Trivia On This Page
The words that say "It's debated which laguz with Formshift, Naesala or Kurthnaga, is the worst." caught my attention on this page. Now I question the lines of logic this follows. Especially seeing that Naesala doubles every enemy in his attack range at base starting from his jointime (4-P). Wheras Kurthnaga, while at base, gets doubled by every enemy except a few Bishops during his jointime (4-E-1), and needs +2 Spd (for 24 AS) to avoid getting doubled by Generals and magic users, and +1-2 more (for a total of 26-28 AS) for everything else barring Sephiran and Ashera (which needs 30 AS to help him avoid getting doubled). The only things Kurthnaga can double at base are dragon laguz that aren't named Dheginsea. Adding to that, Naesala has Formshift at base, meanwhile Kurthnaga has to rely on Olivi Grass, Laguz Stones and/or Laguz Gems until 4-E-3 is completed to transform with full strength. And his Atk rating at base is 42 while Naesala's base Atk is 49 and will likely be higher when 4-E rolls over. Considering all of this, where did the supposed constant debate come from? Because this is the first time I am hearing of this. Any clarification would be nice. --LittleAl16 20:12, October 24, 2011 (UTC)