Necessary Disambig?Edit

Is the Disambig of Avatar really that necessary, but wouldn't just the Game Mechanics page be just as "Avatar" since it's already listed the two known Avatars and we kinda already turned it into a page instead?-- King Marth 64 (talkother wikisblogs) FE4_Junior_Lord_Sprite.gif Peace_Ness.png 08:03, December 31, 2012 (UTC)

I don't really understand what you're trying to say, but in short, no, not really, it's fine. Check Otherarrow's talk page for more information.--Aivass Remurias (talk) 08:07, December 31, 2012 (UTC)

We already did discussed about it from November 30th that he saids it shouldn't be a Disambig when the page was a Disambig before.-- King Marth 64 (talkother wikisblogs) FE4_Junior_Lord_Sprite.gif Peace_Ness.png 08:12, December 31, 2012 (UTC)

I'm aware, but I don't think you understand. Please read the most recent thread on Otherarrow's talk page if you wish to know what the intention is for the whole thing.--Aivass Remurias (talk) 08:21, December 31, 2012 (UTC)

No, I do understand, but I am not sure if he knew or not if there was a Disambig again (that I did see that you did let him Know about FE12's Avatar was moved, that I don't see anything about recreated a Disambig for Avatar again), let's wait unitl Otherarrow say about it here what he thinks. I seriously don't think that a Disambig for Avatar is that necessary, but we can just wait unitl what he saids about this disambig, I sometimes get confused.-- King Marth 64 (talkother wikisblogs) FE4_Junior_Lord_Sprite.gif Peace_Ness.png 08:43, December 31, 2012 (UTC)

Being confused by itself is fine by me, but disambig pages are for um, well... pages with the same name. Now that you got what you and you alone wanted so badly, namely getting My Unit (Shin Monsho no Nazo) moved to Avatar (Shin Monsho no Nazo) (where I had to fix each and every link, by the way...), I'm surprised you are complaining about it. But never mind all that, right? Like I said, check out Otherarrow's latest talk page thread. The whole thing recently where you complained to him about something I did (where I wisely chose to not even respond) was because we were all so unaware of how infrequently you look at our user talk pages. And now it's happening again, even though I already said exactly where to look for the information you are seeking. All your questions should be answered right there. Sorry if I am being a bit more blunt than usual, but it is hard to communicate with you, so I'm just telling it like it is.--Aivass Remurias (talk) 08:57, December 31, 2012 (UTC)
Sometime soon, it will all be a moot point. That's a pretty poor summary of current events for you, but there you go, best I could do without you reading what was said recently. And sorry for any trouble. I'll just get the obligatory apology out of the way right now.--Aivass Remurias (talk) 09:07, December 31, 2012 (UTC)
Here's the link, for the record's sake.--Aivass Remurias (talk) 09:11, December 31, 2012 (UTC)
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.